Legal Opinion
In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against Sherman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 1960No. C. D. 4687Published
1Opinion of the Court
58 Wn.2d 1 (1960)
354 P.2d 888
In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceedings Against ARTHUR EBER SHERMAN, JR., an Attorney at Law.[*]
No. C.D. 4687.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
August 11, 1960.
T.M. Royce, for Board of Governors.
Arthur Eber Sherman, pro se.
The Attorney General and George Neff Stevens, amici curiae.
HILL, J.
The board of governors of the Washington State Bar Association has recommended the disbarment of Arthur Eber Sherman, Jr., for making false answers in his application for admission (by examination) to practice law in the state of Washington.
He falsely stated that he…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Burns v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- In Re the Discipline of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re Disbarment of I. A. ChmelikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.