Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against Sherman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1960No. C. D. 4687PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The board of governors of the Washington State Bar Association has recommended the disbarment of Arthur Eber Sherman, Jr., for making false answers in his application for admission (by examination) to practice law in the state of Washington.

He falsely stated that he had never taken the bar examination in any other state and ignored the further question, “If so, were you successful?” He had, in fact, taken bar examinations twice in California and twice in Oregon; he had failed both times in California and once in Oregon.

Mr. Sherman was discharged from the United States Army Air Corps as a…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLendonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Matter of DoeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1992
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API