Legal Opinion · Dissent

Daw v. Niles

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1894No. 19140Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Dissent

Garoutte, J.,

dissenting. — I am compelled to dissent from the views and conclusion of the court declared in this case. If I clearly grasp the grounds upon which the court has based its conclusion, they are in the main that this oral agreement offered to be proven was collateral to the principal contract, and also made without consideration. To my mind neither of these positions has any support whatever. The oral agreement was neither collateral, nor was it without consideration. The consideration for it was the loan of the money, and this agreement to pay the taxes was based upon that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stein v. SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Commonwealth v. McClanahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Burbridge v. LemmertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API