Legal Opinion

Burbridge v. Lemmert

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1893No. 14920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Varclief, C.

Action to foreclose a mortgage on real property to secure the payment of a promissory note, dated January 29, 1889, for twelve thousand dollars, made by defendant, payable to plaintiff, or order, five years after date, with interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum, payable annually, and if not so paid annually, then the whole principal and interest to become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of the note.

The defendant failed to pay interest for the first year, and about six months after it became due (September 1,1890) this action to foreclose for both…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daw v. NilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Matthews v. OrmerdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Daw v. NilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Daw v. NilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API