Commonwealth v. McClanahan
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 3 — APPEAL FROM BRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE STITES
delivered the otinion oe the court:
This is a prosecution under the act of March, 1854, prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons.
The indictment was held bad on demurrer, and whether properly so held, is the only question to be considered.
The first section of the act declares, “ that if any person shall hereafter carry any concealed deadly weapons, other than an ordinary pocket-knife — except as provided in the next section — he shall be fined on the first conviction not less than fifty dollars,” &c.
The next section provides that the carrying of such weapons shall be legal in…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Dials v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Cuneo v. BornsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Akers v. DemondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Commonwealth v. L. &. N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Leonard v. DraperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.