Legal Opinion
Martinez-Rodriguez v. Giles
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided May 20, 2019No. Case No. 1:17-cv-0001-DCNPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David C. Nye, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Defendants Curtis Giles, David Funk, Funk Daily, Inc., and Shoesole Farms, Inc.'s (Collectively "Defendants" or "Funk Dairy") Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 35) and Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Expert Disclosure (Dkt. 36).
On January 9, 2019, the Court held oral argument and took the motions under advisement. Upon review, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court finds good cause to GRANT Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.
II. BACKGROUND1
Plaintiffs are six professional veterinarians from Mexico…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Donald L. Snell v. Cleveland, Inc., and Patricia Faber John Does Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Drake v. Montgomery County, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Hamilton v. Franklin, Tennessee, City ofDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Kinman v. BurnopDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- MALLELA v. COGENT INFOTECH CORP.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Schrader v. WynnDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.