Legal Opinion

United States v. American Electric Power Service Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 16, 2002No. C2-99-1182, C2-99-1250PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Plaintiffs’ Motions to Strike certain Affirmative Defenses raised by Defendants (Doc. # 117 in case 99-1182 and Doc. # 102 in case 99-1250). For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiffs’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.

I

Plaintiffs United States of America, the Intervening Northeastern States and the various Citizen Groups bring this action seeking redress for Defendants’ alleged violations of § 304(a)(3) of the Clean Air Act [“CAA”], 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a)(3), in connection with…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AnhornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  3. Frisby v. Keith D. Weiner & Associates Co., LPADistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CubanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  5. Montanans for Multiple Use v. BarbouletosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API