Legal Opinion
Montanans for Multiple Use v. Barbouletos
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2008No. Civil 03-1244 (TFH)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Upon careful review of the motion, plaintiffs’ opposition, and the replies thereto, the Court will grant defendants’ motion.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs, Montanans for Multiple Use, et al. (“plaintiffs”) are fourteen individuals and entities — both private and governmental. 1 Named defendants include Cathy Barbouletos, Forest Supervisor for the Flathead National Forest; Brad Powell, Regional Forester for the Northern…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allan J. Jablonski v. Pan American World Airways, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McNamara v. PickenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- McNamara v. PickenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- J.B. v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- American Council of Life Insurers v. District of Columbia Health Benefit Exchange AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Robinson v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.