Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 23, 2004No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK)PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KESSLER, District Judge.

This matter is now before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendants’ 1 Equitable Defenses of Waiver, Equitable Estoppel, Laches, Unclean Hands, and In Part Delicto (“Motion”). The Government argues that each of these affirmative defenses is insufficient as a matter of law and must be dismissed. 2

The essence of the Government’s argument is that the equitable defenses of waiver, equitable estoppel, laches, unclean hands and in pari delicto may not be asserted against the United States when, as here, “it is acting…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hibbing Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  3. C & E SERVICES, INC. v. Ashland, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CubanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  5. United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API