Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1937No. 19185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder with malice aforethought, and his punishment was assessed at death.

At his trial, he reserved four bills of exceptions which he brought forward, each of which he contends reflects reversible error. . .

His first bill shows that the district attorney, in reading the written dying declaration of the deceased to the jury,, misread the last sentence thereof, to which appellant objected. The court promptly sustained the objection, and the district attorney .immediately confessed the error and corrected it. The court, in its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Shelburne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. La Coume v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leviness v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Leviness v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API