Legal Opinion

Dorfman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 9, 1956No. Reap. Dec. 8555; Entry No. 8-B, etcPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OlivbR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve determination of the value of finished and unfinished cigar lighters, imported from Mexico, and entered at the port of Brownsville, Tex.

When the appeals for reappraisement were called for hearing at Brownsville, Tex., there was no appearance, either in person or by attorney, by Isador Dorfman, named as plaintiff in reappraisements 222255-A to 222267-A, inclusive, or by Dorcel Products Co., the named plaintiff in reappraisements 222268-A to 222348-A, inclusive. Government…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Match Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  3. United States v. Reedy Forwarding Co.United States Customs Court · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Control Data Corp.United States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Springman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API