Legal Opinion

Match Import Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 6, 1940No. 4762; Entry Nos. DCE 147, 201, 237, 258, 289, 342, 356, 450, 471, 517, 794, 296PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Kincheloe, Judge:

The United States Fidelty & Guaranty Co. has filed before this court a motion to intervene as a party plaintiff in the matter of Match Import Co., Inc., by the Hipage Co. v. United States, involving reappraisements 99827-A, etc.

It appears from the briefs filed by counsel for the moving party that said company, as surety, with the customs broker who made entry of the merchandise covered by the appeals in question, as principal, duly executed certain term entry bonds; that said bonds were filed with the collector of customs at Norfolk, Va., the port of entry of said…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilmington Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United States Treasury DepartmentUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Dorfman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. United States v. Reedy Forwarding Co.United States Customs Court · 1950
  5. United States v. HauserUnited States Customs Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API