United States ex rel. Ackley v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
This is a relator’s suit under the qui tarn provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. Following the Court’s Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint,1 Defendants were directed to file pleadings responsive to Count III, the only count remaining in the Second Amended Complaint, which alleges retaliation in violation of the FCA, 31 U.S.C. § 8730(h). Defendants have responded by filing a partial Motion to Dismiss Count III,2 and alternatively ask the Court to Strike significant…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- U.S. ex rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- US Ex Rel. Ackley v. INTERN. BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004