State v. Rojers
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 This opinion examines whether the trial court properly denied the motion of Richard Russell Rojers (“Rojers”) to suppress evidence that was obtained from an allegedly unconstitutional automobile search. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 After receiving a tip from a concerned neighbor, the police conducted surveillance on Rojers’s apartment, hoping to apprehend him based on an outstanding misdemeanor warrant. When Rojers exited his apartment and drove away, the police followed in unmarked cars. He was driving “erratic[ally],”…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HuertaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State of Arizona v. Feliciano Ontiveros-LoyaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. TarkingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. FreeneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Bnccorp v. HubCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.