Moyle v. Connolly
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. Ejectment to recover a belt of land lying on the boundary-line between fifty-vara lots Nos. 4 and 5, and fractional fifty-vara lots Nos. 2 and 3, in the city of San Francisco.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. Ejectment to recover a belt of land lying on the boundary-line between fifty-vara lots Nos. 4 and 5, and fractional fifty-vara lots Nos. 2 and 3, in the city of San Francisco. In 1863, William Y. Wells owned said fractional fifty-vara lots, and the defendant Connolly owned lots 4 and 5. Said Wells and the defendant then entered into an agreement in writing, from which the following extract constitutes the substance: “This indenture witnesseth, that for and in consideration of the sum of one hundred…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
We are of opinion that the written agreement made by *298Wells and Connolly on the second day of April, 1863, established the line between the parties here.
Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
2Cited by5 opinions
- White v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Dierssen v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Johnson v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Nathan v. DierssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Quinn v. WindmillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885