Legal Opinion

Wentland v. Uhlarik

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 23, 2007No. 96,390PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAnany, J.:

John Uhlarik appeals the district court’s final order in this protection from stalking (PFS) action, arguing that the order was not based on substantial competent evidence. We find ample evidence to support the district court’s order and, therefore, affirm.

Gwen Wentland is a professional track and field athlete who competes in the high jump. Beginning in 1995 she was involved in a romantic relationship with Uhlarik, a professor of psychology at Kansas State University. Wentland and Uhlarik lived together for a time. Their relationship ended in August 2000.

On February 26, 2001,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Lincoln County Comm'rs v. NielanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Unified School District No. 233 v. Kansas Ass'n of American EducatorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Nicholas v. NicholasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. Hill v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. In Re the Care & Treatment of MilesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  3. Wells Fargo Vendor Fin. Servs., LLC v. Nationwide Learning, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  5. Kerry G. v. Stacy C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API