Santa Rosa City Railroad v. Central Street Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. S. IC. Dougherty, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court rendered upon the former hearing in Bank reported in 38 Pac. Rep. 986, and in the present opinion of the court upon rehearing.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
In this cause it is impossible for a majority of the court to arrive at a conclusion upon the merits of the case, for the reason that the chief justice is disqualified, and, of the six associates, Justices Van Fleet, Garoutte, and McFarland think that the judg*437ment of the lower court should be reversed for the reasons given in the former opinion of Justice Van Fleet (38 Pac. Rep. 986), and Justices Henshaw, Harrison, and Temple think that said judgment should be affirmed. The case has been twice argued in Bank— orally and by briefs—and frequent consultations have demonstrated that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Frankel v. DeidesheimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Hampton v. McClungSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Matter of ZanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- REA Enterprises v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Los Angeles Ry. Co. v. Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction WorksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.