Legal Opinion

Uthe v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 2001No. C6-00-1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge

This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss respondent’s complaint for insufficient service of process. Because the district court incorrectly concluded that appellant’s actions in a separate lawsuit constituted waiver of the defense, or collaterally estopped appellant from asserting the defense in this lawsuit, we reverse.

FACTS

In October 1992, respondent Kimberly Uthe (Uthe), who was a minor, and her mother, Karen Uthe, were injured when appellant Eileen Baker’s car struck their car from behind while the Uthe vehicle was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Lewis v. Contracting Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koski v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Shamrock Development, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Thorson v. Zollinger Dental, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API