Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Harvey
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 3, 1923No. Nos. 3188, 3193PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLindley, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The motion to dismiss the appeals should be denied. All defendants except the Plankinton Arcade Company are citizens of the state of Ohio. That Company is a corporation organized under the laws of Wisconsin and the plaintiff resides in Wisconsin. But the Plankinton Company is not an indispensable party. The relief sought by the plaintiff is a decree adjudging the stock deposit agreement void, enjoining all the defendants other than the Company from voting any stock in which plaintiff is interested, and enjoining the Company from “accepting, receiving, or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Barney v. LathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Luther v. C. J. Luther Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Thompson v. Terminal Shares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Lilienfeld's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Galdi v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.