Carr v. Pacific Telephone Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KERRIGAN, J.
This is an action by the widow and minor children of Fred W. Carr, deceased, to recover damages from a telephone company *540for his wrongful death. The jury returned with a defense verdict. Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was denied, and plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.1
The trial court instructed the jury on the doctrine of assumption of risk (BATI No. 4.30, as modified) and admitted some evidence of the fact that decedent had been involved in an immoral affair with a minor in 1961 and had suffered a conviction for issuing checks without sufficient funds for which he…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Vibert v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Ewing v. Cloverleaf BowlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bihun v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.