Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Pridmore

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1950No. Civ. 14268PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff, Dorothy Richardson, and her husband were tenants in an apartment owned by defendant Friedman and managed by defendant Pridmore. The defendants unlawfully evicted the plaintiff and Ijer husband. Plaintiff then brought this action alleging three causes of action. The first is in tort for damages for the wilful and unlawful eviction of the plaintiff, who was then pregnant and shortly thereafter suffered a miscarriage; the second is for damage to plaintiff’s clothing, while the third is for conversion of plaintiff’s property. The jury returned verdicts for the plaintiff on all three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bowden v. Spiegel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Emden v. VitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Goldman v. HouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Tate v. CanonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API