State v. Propotnik
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
Defendant, whose burglary conviction, Minn. St. 609.58, subd. 2(3), was based on a guilty plea, now contends on this direct appeal from the judgment of conviction that (1) the record does not affirmatively show that he waived his right under Minn. St. 628.31 to a preliminary hearing and the case should be remanded to the district court for a hearing to determine whether he was prejudiced by the lack of a hearing; and (2) he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea because the transcript of the guilty plea proceedings does not show that the trial court specifically informed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Richard J. FronteroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Harold Jimmy Wade v. Ira M. Coiner, Warden of the West Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. John William ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Welper v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Doughman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.