Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Boostrom v. Board of Review

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1969No. 176PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issues presented are:

1. Was there sufficient evidence offered by the relators to show the Boostrom property was not assessed at its actual market value?

2. Should the land owned and used as a golf course be assessed as agricultural land instead of residential?

3. Were the residential and agricultural lands assessed upon a nonuniform statutory basis so as to impose an unequal burden of taxation ?

Basic to the issues are the constitutional provision that “[t]he rule of taxation shall be uniform 3 . . . ,” and the statutory direction as how real estate is to be valued. Sec. 70.32 (1), Stats.,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Marsh v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  3. State ex rel. N. C. Foster Lumber Co. v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Evansville Mercantile Ass'n v. City of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State ex rel. Vilas v. WhartonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Markarian v. City of CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Darcel, Inc. v. City of Manitowoc Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Geipel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API