Legal Opinion
A & a CREDIT CO. v. Berquist
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1950No. 35,155PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chibe Justice.
This is a mandamus proceeding in this court to compel a change of venue in an action for claim and delivery of an automobile from Ramsey county to Hennepin county. The car was sold on an installment contract by plaintiff-respondent, which, under M. S. A. 542.09, is a resident of Ramsey county. There was an alleged default, a demand for possession, and a refusal thereof by defendants-relators, who are in possession in Hennepin county, where they reside. The district court of Ramsey county refused to grant defendants’ demand for a change of venue to Hennepin county.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baker v. FalesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
- Heiser v. SeveryMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Leonard v. MaginnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Guthrie v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Chouteau v. Rice, H. M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1852
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Storms v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011