Heiser v. Severy
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This Action Is Not a Suit Against the State of Montana.
Counsel for appellants have submitted a lengthy brief citing many cases on the point that a state cannot be sued without its consent. In fact, we believe all the authorities cited in appellants' brief relate only to this general question. All of this argument is beside the point until it can be shown that the state has authorized defendants to do what they assumed to do.
In the case at bar it is alleged that the defendants, in violation of the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Montana, and the laws of Montana,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rupp v. BryantSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Pfost v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Coldwater v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Peretti v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.