Legal Opinion
Levine v. Hite
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 16, 2019No. AC40626PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.
The plaintiff, Michelle Levine, appeals from the trial court's judgment of nonsuit rendered in favor of the defendants, Randall Hite and Tanya Hite, as a result of the plaintiff's failure to comply with three previous orders of the court regarding discovery. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the court, Noble, J. , improperly raised and considered a prior ruling of the court, Shapiro, J. , without affording her a fair opportunity to respond, (2) the plaintiff's failure to comply with discovery orders did not warrant the rendering of a judgment of nonsuit by the court, Hon. A. Susan Peck…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Tomasso Bros. v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Kevin Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Krevis v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Angela V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021