Legal Opinion
Spaid v. Liverpool Central School District
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert G. Hurlbutt, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks to vacate the determination of the respondent Liverpool School District denying her application for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System pursuant to section 803 (b) (3) of the Retirement and Social Security Law. Petitioner was employed by respondent School District as a *43part-time teaching assistant from September 1969 to June 1976. In 1969, her position was not eligible for participation in the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System (retirement system).…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. BenzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- De Milio v. BorghardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- MATTER OF BEACH v. ShanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- St. Andrassy v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Van Antwerp v. Board of Education for the Liverpool Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. Cutten, New York County Courts1999