Legal Opinion

People v. Cutten

New York County Courts

Decided October 26, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wayne A. Feeman, Jr., J.

Issue

In these companion appeals, the defendants challenge *532adjudications after a bench trial on July 6, 1999 in the Town Court of the Town of Andover that they had violated section . 65-c of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. The court notes at the outset, by virtue of subdivision (4) of section 65-c, that the adjudications are not to be considered “convictions.”

In pertinent part, subdivision (1) of section 65-c reads as follows: “[N]o person under the age of twenty-one years shall possess any alcoholic beverage * * * with the intent to consume such…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. People v. GarafoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. People v. MorenoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Ekman, New York County Courts2000
  2. People v. KnickerbockerDickinson Justice Court · 2000
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API