C. B. Crosland Co. v. Pearson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gage, J., Marlboro, April, 1909. Action by C. B. Crosland Co. against Rachel E. Pearson. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: Proof of entries in merchant’s book: Green, sec. 115 ; McKelvey, sec. 164; 17 Cyc., 368, 370; 45 Strob., 58; 1 N. & McC., 186; 1 Brev., 105; 1 Bay, 473, 38; 2 McM., 133. Charge on facts for Judge to say only one pivotal question: 38 S. C., 31; 47 S. C., 513; 56 S. C., 531; 49 S. C., 305; 27 S. C., 549; 16 Ency., 465; 35 S. C.,…
Read the full summary
Before Gage, J., Marlboro, April, 1909. Action by C. B. Crosland Co. against Rachel E. Pearson. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: Proof of entries in merchant’s book: Green, sec. 115 ; McKelvey, sec. 164; 17 Cyc., 368, 370; 45 Strob., 58; 1 N. & McC., 186; 1 Brev., 105; 1 Bay, 473, 38; 2 McM., 133. Charge on facts for Judge to say only one pivotal question: 38 S. C., 31; 47 S. C., 513; 56 S. C., 531; 49 S. C., 305; 27 S. C., 549; 16 Ency., 465; 35 S. C., 180; 66 S. C., 485; 76 S. C., 63. cite: Stating issues is not charging on facts: 55 S. C., 403; 74 S. C., 338; 68 S. C.,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion.' of the Court was delivered by
Mr Justice; Gary.
This is an action upon an account, for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff, to the defendant.
The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $395.40, which was afterwards reduced to $387.65, and the defendant appealed.
1 The first exception assigns error, on the part of his Honor, the presiding Judge, in charging the jury that “there is only one pivotal issue in this case for you, and that is, who made this contract, to whom did Crosland intend to sell the goods, and who intended to buy them?” on the ground that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. StillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Walker & Trenholm v. LaneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- Miles v. Postal Tel. Cable Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Stackhouse v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Howerton v. Joplin Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Wynn v. ConeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.