Legal Opinion

Wynn v. Coney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1958No. 17390PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

This action was instituted by L. R. Wynn and Henry C. Brunson, partners, trading as Wynn and Brunson, the respondents herein, against Albert H. Coney and Carlton G. Davies, partners, trading as Coney-Davies Lumber Company, the appellants herein, and Hamptonite Door Manufacturing Company.

The action is one brought for the purpose of recoving the balance due on the purchase price of certain lumber which the respondents assert that they sold and delivered to the appellants. It was alleged in the complaint that Coney-Davies Lumber Company and Hamptonite Door Manufacturing-Company…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Norris v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  2. Sample v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Drayton v. Industrial Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Bourne v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Mullinax v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jumper v. GoodwinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Vaught v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. United States v. FieldsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API