Legal Opinion
Verschuuren v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 18, 1983No. 82 Civ. 908 (MEL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
This action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1976) is consolidated with Burns v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 79 Civ. 4726. The statutory provision at issue in the instant motion has been considered at length in rulings in the Bums action, familiarity with which is assumed. See 530 F.Supp. 768 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff’d, 696 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1982).
The Equitable Life Assurance Society (Equitable) moves pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.Pr. 56 for summary judgment on the grounds that Charles Verschuuren’s right to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chardon v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pfister v. Allied Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Burns v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wheatley v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Gerzog v. London Fog Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Evelyn McCONNELL and Floyd Ray Addy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Corcoran v. GAB Business Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Sharpe v. American Express Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.