In Re Milstead
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Habeas Corpus to secure the release of persons imprisoned in the city jail pending examination as to their being afflicted with a quarantinable disease. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Habeas corpus. Petitioners herein prosecute this writ for the purpose of being relieved from imprisonment in the city jail of Los Angeles city, the petition setting forth that they were therein held without process or warrant of law. It is alleged in the petition that at 1 o’clock A. M. on a certain Sunday morning of August, petitioners were arrested by police officers in Los Angeles city; that such officers had no warrant for the arrest of petitioners and that upon being arrested petitioners were held in the city jail until the hour of 8 o’clock P. M. of the same day, without…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by11 opinions
- People ex rel. Barmore v. RobertsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Adair v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- In Re ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Rock v. CarneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.