Legal Opinion
Olson v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2004No. 03-9528PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Hazel Olson (Complainant) seeks review of the dismissal of her administrative complaint by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the Commission). Complainant failed to file her complaint within the 60-day period provided by § 105(c)(2) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2). She claims that she delayed filing until her husband was disabled because of her fear that her former employer, Jacobs Ranch Coal Company (Jacobs Ranch), would retaliate against her husband (who worked for Jacobs Ranch) or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Roger Justice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sierra Club v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Carpio v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Big Ridge, Inc. v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Pendley v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Newton v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.