Legal Opinion

Newton v. Federal Aviation Administration

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2006No. 05-9548PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

This case arises under the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 40101 et seq. (as amended). Robert Newton petitions for our review of an order of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determining that it lacked jurisdiction to review the decision of the Utah Air National Guard (ANG) to withdraw permanently Mr. Newton’s air-traffic-control-specialist (ATCS) certificate. We have jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 44709(f), 46110(a), to review the NTSB’s order. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Mr. Newton became an air traffic controller 1 in 1968, when the Federal Aviation…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Thomas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Ronald Buckler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  4. Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Andalex Resources, Inc. v. Mine Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API