Legal Opinion
Harshad & Nasir Corp. v. Global Sign Sys., Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 15, 2017No. B269427; No. B275942; No. B275947PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRothschild, P.J.
*526Global Sign Systems, Inc. (Global) sued Friendly Franchisees Corporation (FFC) to recover $114,823.72 allegedly owed on unpaid invoices. A few weeks before trial, the parties agreed to submit the dispute to arbitration. Five years later, the arbitrator, Retired Judge David D. Perez, awarded Global $1,154,793.72 in damages, $702,093.86 in prejudgment interest, and $1,142,596.20 in costs and attorney fees. The arbitrator also added four affiliates of FFC (the Affiliates) as joint and several obligors under the award.1
Global petitioned the superior court to confirm the award, and FFC and the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Cohen v. Mylife.com CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Housing Auth City of Calexico v. Multi-Housing Tax Credit PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Monster Energy Co. v. SchechterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- The Law Firm of Fox and Fox v. Arias CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.