Legal Opinion

Lane v. Peterson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1926No. 4405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, C. J.

In June, 1923, the plaintiff Lane and cross-complainant Peterson were employed by the United Filters Corporation. Plaintiff by profession is an engineer and was at that time in charge of the Salt Lake City office of that corporation. It appears that the United Filters Corporation was engaged in manufacturing and selling á filtration machine or device used in mining and in sugar refining. It- also appears that plaintiff had been engaged prior to this time in an effort to determine the value of certain clays for the purpose of filtration to be used in filtering and decolorizing oils. Defendant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Utah National Bank of Salt Lake City v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Ferrell v. WiswellUtah Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. Happy Valley, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Greco v. GrakoUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Wasatch Livestock Loan Co. v. Lewis & SharpUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hanson v. Mutual Finance Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API