Legal Opinion

Ferrell v. Wiswell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1914No. 2510PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by W. Ferrell against Frederick A. Wiswell and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

On the 17th day of March, 1906, the plaintiff, hereinafter called appellant, commenced this action in the District Court of Salt Lake County against the defendants Wiswell, Ball, Clark, and Onasch, hereinafter styled respondents, to set aside a deed whereby appellant conveyed a certain parcel of *203land of about five acres, with a water right to the respondent Clark for the nse and benefit of himself, said Wiswell, Ball, and others, who were their associates. The deed was executed on the 25th day of September, 1905, and appellant alleged that it was obtained through misrepresentation, fraud, and…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Taylor v. MooreUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Jones v. Mackey PriceUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Greco v. GrakoUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  5. H. S. Barrington, Andrew Reid, Albert M. Johnson, and Charles Sidney Noble v. Arthur SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API