Legal Opinion

Norton v. Smith

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 13, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

Action of assumpsit- by the plaintiff as administrator c. t. a. of the estate of Alma E. Bradbury, late of Belfast, to recover a balance claimed to be due on a note given to the testatrix by the defendant. The plaintiff relies only on the last two counts of his declaration: (4) on a promissory note dated June 1, *591925, for thirteen thousand five hundred dollars payable on demand with interest, and (5) on the same note alleged to have been lost.

The defendant pleads the general issue with a brief statement that on June 1,1925, for valuable consideration, he gave the testatrix a note for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. CornellSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Darland v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Sullivan v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Henson v. HensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. McDonald v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Street Trust Co. v. Muskogee Electric Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  2. State Street Trust Co. v. Muskogee Electric Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API