Gordon v. City of Beaverton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) order dismissing their appeal from a land use decision of the respondent City of Beaverton. The ground for LUBA’s dismissal was that petitioners filed their petition for review and supporting brief one day after the statutory period for doing so had elapsed. The issue, as formulated by petitioners and the city, is whether filing the petition and brief within the time prescribed by Oregon Laws 1979, ch 772, § 4(6) is a jurisdictional requirement or is one which LUBA has discretion to waive or extend. 1
Appeals to LUBA are initiated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- David M. Scott Construction Corp. v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Neppach v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Scott v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- World Literature Crusade v. Insurance DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gordon v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Hoffman v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Hillsboro v. Housing Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Hoffman v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- City of Pendleton v. KernsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.