Legal Opinion

City of Hillsboro v. Housing Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 1983No. 81-128, CA A24429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

The City of Hillsboro (City) appeals from a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision reversing the City’s determination' that a 90-unit housing project for migrant farmworkers is not a use permitted outright in the City’s A-2 (multi-family) zones. The City found that the project proposed by the Housing Development Corporation of Washington County (HDC), is only a “permitted” use and, as such, could be approved only through the City’s conditional use permit process. LUBA reversed, holding that the project fits within the City’s definition of “multi-family dwelling” and is therefore a use…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Curly's Dairy, Inc. v. State Department of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Gordon v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API