Legal Opinion

Ingle v. McCurry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1955No. 306PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsoN, J.

This is a civil action to recover the balance alleged to be due on a promissory note. The defendant by answer admits the execution of the note but denies that any sum remains due thereon. Also, by way of affirmative defense the defendant alleges: (1) that the note was given for the balance of the purchase price of real estate and was secured by mortgage; (2) that the note and mortgage were prepared under the direction and supervision of the plaintiffs, sellers of the real estate; (3) that the mortgage has been foreclosed by exercise of the power of sale; and (4) that consequently this action,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Hedgecock v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Chasteen v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. Hahn v. Brinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Graded School Trustees of Elizabeth City v. HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Burnette Industries, Inc. v. Danbar of Winston-Salem, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Lucas v. FelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API