Legal Opinion

Burnette Industries, Inc. v. Danbar of Winston-Salem, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1986No. 8521SC888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The question posed by this appeal is whether the anti-deficiency judgment statute G.S. 45-21.38 prohibits the plaintiff from recovering interest on a purchase money note. We hold that it does so prohibit and affirm the judgment of the superior court.

The plaintiff argues that there is no deficiency because when the lots were reconveyed to it the agreement was that this would be in payment of the entire principal. The plaintiff says that because the entire principal was paid there can be no deficiency. We hold the interest was part of the debt secured by the purchase money deed of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Barnaby v. BoardmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Brown v. . KirkpatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Reavis v. Ecological Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Ingle v. McCurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank One, Arizona, N.A. v. BeauvaisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Friedlmeier v. AltmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Bigley v. LombardoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API