Legal Opinion

Trennis K. Lile v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1963No. 18206_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

Respondent moves at the outset to dismiss the petition for review as tardily filed. Section 25(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides that: “Any person aggrieved by an order issued by the Commission * * * may obtain a review of such order in the United States Court of Appeals * * * by filing in such court, within sixty days after the entry of such order, a written petition praying that the order of the Commission be modified or set aside in whole or in part.” [15 U.S.C. § 78y(a).]

Here the challenged order was issued by the Commission on July 9, 1962, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Medical Committee for Human Rights v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Gearhart & Otis, Inc., Frederick D. Gearhart, Jr. And Edward v. Otis v. Securities and Exchange Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  3. Thomas A. SARTAIN, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Robert T. Stead v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. Richard B. BERDAHL, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API