Legal Opinion

Pulliam v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 26, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Sampson—

Affirming.

The warrant accuses appellant Pulliam of the offense of unlawfully having in his possession intoxicating liquors, and a trial resulted in a conviction, the punishment being fixed at a fine of $100.00 and confinement in the county jail for thirty days. Being displeased with the result, Pulliam appeals.

As grounds for a reversal of the judgment appellant insists (1) that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the warrant; (2) in overruling defendant’s motion *411for a peremptory instruction made at the conclusion both of the evidence for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Price v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Handshoe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Fletcher v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Patrick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Vanover v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Baker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Alford v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API