Legal Opinion

Alford v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 17, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Sampson—

Reversing.

The indictment in this case accused appellant Alford of the offense of selling intoxicating liquors to John Ringo, in October, 1921. At the trial the Commonwealth introduced the witness Ringo, who testified in substance that he bought a half-pint of whiskey from appellant Alford and paid him $1.50 therefor ; this happened in the town of Winchester, county of Clark, sometime in October, 1921. Ringo was the only witness testifying for the Commonwealth who related any fact concerning the alleged sale. However, the Commonwealth called four…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Price v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Keith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Handshoe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Fletcher v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Pulliam v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peace v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API