Legal Opinion

State v. Purnell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 15, 1992PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

*523O’HERN, J.

The central question in this capital appeal is whether a jury may impose a sentence of death on the basis that the murder was committed in the course of a felony without being permitted to consider, in the guilt-innocence phase of the capital trial, the non-capital verdict of felony murder. We find such a procedure to be constitutionally defective. The right to trial by jury includes the right to have the jury consider “all of the possible offenses that might reasonably be found” from the facts of a case. State v. Ramseur, 106 N.J. 123, 271…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. State v. DiFriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. State v. ReddishSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. MartiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API