Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Ransome-Crummey Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1918No. Civ. No. 2420PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLY, J., pro tem.

The questions in this case arise out of the sale of certain property of the plaintiff to pay certain street assessment bonds which were issued by the city of Oakland in a proceeding taken by it under the Improvement Act of 1911. (Stats. 1911, p. 730.) The plaintiff brought an action to quiet title against the defendant, and the defendant answered, admitting that it asserted an interest in the real estate described in the complaint, and filed a cross-complaint, in which it set up all the proceedings leading up to the issuance of the bonds mentioned. Without going further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Tilton v. RussekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Haughawout v. PercivalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. City of San Diego v. NeumannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of San Diego v. NeumannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Talbot v. WakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API