Steinbock-Sinclair v. Amoco International Oil Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE: JURISDICTION
PERRY, Senior District Judge.
This cause came on for trial on the issue of whether jurisdiction exists in this Court pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 1332(c). The Court, sitting without a jury, having heard the evidence of the witnesses and having examined the documentary evidence submitted by both parties, and having heard the arguments of counsel, hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
Findings of Fact
1. The plaintiff, Robert SteinbockSinclair, as of the time of filing this lawsuit, was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scot Typewriter Co. v. Underwood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Eisenberg v. Commercial Union Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Gilardi v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
- Dryden v. Ranger Refining & Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- In Re Hudson River Nav. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Jackson v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1978
- Messinger v. United Canso Oil & Gas Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- Northeast Nuclear Energy Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Barrantes Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.