Mossman v. Amana Society
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
The principal question in this tort action is whether one or both defendants must pay plaintiff prejudgment interest on the jury’s award of future damages. The district court, while recognizing that the case predates legislation enacted to preclude such awards, denied plaintiff interest on the grounds of fairness. Our court of appeals affirmed in part, and reversed in part, based on the dates each party was sued. We granted the parties’ applications for further review. We now vacate the court of appeals opinion, affirm in part and reverse in part the district court’s judgment,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shover v. Iowa Lutheran HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Stanley Ex Rel. Stanley v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- In Re the Marriage of BaculisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Mercy Hospital v. Hansen, Lind & Meyer, P.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Mermigis v. Servicemaster Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Edwards v. DaughertySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Hughes v. Burlington Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Opperman v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Bassam Khalil, and B-CO, LLC, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. 3HB Corporation d/b/a Hale Communications, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- Nesbit v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.