Legal Opinion

National Fire Insurance v. Itasca Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1921No. Nos. 22,093, 22,094PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Two actions in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $2,475, respectively, the amount paid under fire-insurance policies- The eases were tried together before Bardwell, J., who at the close of the testimony denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in each case and directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff in each case for $2,475 and $2,500, with interest, respectively.

Read the full summary

Two actions in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $2,475, respectively, the amount paid under fire-insurance policies- The eases were tried together before Bardwell, J., who at the close of the testimony denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in each case and directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff in each case for $2,475 and $2,500, with interest, respectively. From orders denying its motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

These actions were brought to recover damages for a fraud alleged to have been perpetrated by defendant in collecting insurance on mill wood covered by policies issued by plaintiffs. The two cases were com solidated for trial and are here on defendant’s appeal from an order denying its alternative motion, for judgment or for a new trial following directed verdicts for the plaintiffs.

The wood was insured in June, 1912. The policies were in the standard form. Defendant had a sawmill at Minneapolis which it had ceased to operate and was selling off the wood in its yard. In July and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berkey v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  2. Mackellar v. PillsburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Nash v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Hodge v. Franklin InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Commercial Bank of Milwaukee v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Imperial Assur. Co. Of New York v. Joseph Supornick & Son, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Mark v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Joseph Supornick & Son, Inc. v. Imperial Assur. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API